Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is better than Motorola One Vision, having a overall score of 91.8 against 80.7. The Galaxy A71 5G design is newer and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Vision's, although it's just a little bit heavier. The Motorola One Vision has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit more storage for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G has better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.