Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than Motorola razr (2022)'s overall score of 81.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version. The Galaxy A71 5G is a way older and a little bit thicker phone than the Motorola razr (2022), but Samsung could make it just a bit lighter anyway.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G. They have a better quantity of pixels per display inch, the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution and a same size screen. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM. Galaxy A71 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A71 5G has improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.