Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than OPPO Find X2, having a score of 91.8 against 79.7. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and OPPO Find X2 were only released 1 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design is a little bit thicker but also a little bit lighter.
OPPO Find X2 features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better pixels count per inch of display and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a little bit longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a way better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.