Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G body is a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a little higher display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.