Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting a 91.8 score against 83.1. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's body is lighter and just a little bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even though both were released only a couple months apart.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A71 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rates, a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.