Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is way better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting a 91.8 score against 76. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is older, a little thicker and just a little heavier than OPPO Find X3 Neo. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a little bit greater display density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a battery duration that is very similar to the Galaxy A71 5G one.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.