Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | -- |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a score of 91.8 against 77. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Galaxy A71 5G body is a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a little higher display pixels density.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, they both have a back facing camera with a 64 MP resolution, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.