Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's overall score of 84.6. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G is older than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, it's design is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide you identical OS features.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A22 5G has a display that's very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although the Galaxy A22 5G has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution and a way higher video quality. The Galaxy A71 5G has a greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.