Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a overall score of 91.8 against 79.4. The Galaxy A71 5G is a somewhat lighter phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.