Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's general score of 88.1. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy F62, although both of them were released only a few months apart. Both phones we are comparing work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater number of cores. The Galaxy F62 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G. They have the same display density, a screen of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy F62. They have the same video quality, a camera with a 64 mega pixels, a F1.8 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a 0.59 inches back camera sensor. The Galaxy F62 features just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.