Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Galaxy M20, with a 91.8 score against 78.9. These devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features. Galaxy A71 5G's design is newer, just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than Galaxy M20.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a bigger aperture, a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy M20 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.