Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10's 89 global score. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design is newer than Samsung Galaxy Note10's, although it's a little bit heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note10 features a screen that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G one, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos and video in low light environments and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 29 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.