Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's global score of 89.7. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, but it is a little lighter. Galaxy S10 Lite has a display that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G one, both have a same size screen, a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite's memory for games and applications is just as good as the Galaxy A71 5G one, they have the same internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a battery life that's just as good as the Galaxy A71 5G one. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a bigger aperture, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures.
Although Galaxy A71 5G is a better device, it is more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.