Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, getting a score of 91.8 against 90.8. Galaxy A71 5G is a a little thinner and a little lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, although both of them were released with only 4 months difference. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the user all the same OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S20 FE and Galaxy A71 5G feature incredibly similar storage capacity for games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 FE's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's battery performance.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy A71 5G is also a lot cheaper, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.