Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 score. Galaxy A71 5G's design is just a little heavier but somewhat thinner than Galaxy XCover 5, and both were only released 9 months apart. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy A71 5G has a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a higher screen pixel density and a larger screen. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with way more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.