Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's overall score of 77.6. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is notably older than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower pixel density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a little bigger screen. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A71 5G has a little better battery life than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has an 11 percent more battery size. The Galaxy A71 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.