Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a global score of 91.8 against 80.1. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only 3 months difference, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much thinner and noticeably lighter. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light images, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera, a much better (4K) video definition and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery lifetime is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G one.
The Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.