Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with a 91.8 score against 81. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro, although they were only released 5 months apart. Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a display that's just as good as Galaxy A71 5G's screen, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera, a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.