Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip, with a 91.8 score against 88.5. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Galaxy A71 5G's design is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy Z Flip. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little bit greater screen pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. Galaxy A71 5G has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% greater battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A71 5G is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.