Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is slightly better than Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a general score of 91.8 against 85.6. Both devices in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy A71 5G's design is older, thicker and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy Z Flip 3. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.