Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3's 90.6 general score. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G design is much lighter than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it's much thicker and was released around a year before.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.