Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is better than the Sony Xperia XZs's 77.2 general score. Galaxy A71 5G is a somewhat heavier device than the Sony Xperia XZs, but both are equally thin. Xperia XZs counts with a display that's very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although the Xperia XZs has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher screen density.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Sony Xperia XZs captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot worse photo and video quality, a worse 3840x2160 video definition, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos and a back facing camera with a much worse 19 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.