Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, with a global score of 91.8 against 87.9. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Although the Galaxy A71 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro were only released 1 months apart, the Galaxy A71 5G is a little thinner and lighter.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G. Both have a better quantity of pixels per inch of display, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a same size display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A71 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same resolution back camera and a 0.59 inches sensor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.