Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | -- |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a 91.8 score against 77.1. The Galaxy A71 5G body has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but it is just a bit lighter. Both devices in this review work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a just a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A71 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a worse video resolution and a camera in the back with a much lower 64 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.