Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | -- |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 91.8 against 83.1. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a quite better 1220 x 2710 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a camera that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.