Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with a overall score of 91.8 against 80.2. Galaxy A71 5G's body is newer, but a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than ZTE Axon 10 Pro. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has a newer 11 version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a display that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures a little bit better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.