Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is better than LG V20, having a global score of 87.5 against 77. The Galaxy A71 body has the same thickness than the LG V20, but it's a little heavier. The LG V20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better screen density.
The LG V20 features a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 has a bit more powerful CPU than LG V20, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a lot better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a way larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 counts with a way better battery performance than LG V20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V20, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.