Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a score of 87.5, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Samsung Galaxy A71's body is newer and noticeably thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has 4 less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better looking display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 shoots greater videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has higher video frame rates, a bigger aperture and a much more megapixels camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A71 features just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.