Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a global score of 87.5, which is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a way newer and thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's also a bit heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A71, because although it has 4 less cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU.
Galaxy A71 features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Although Galaxy A71 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy A71, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.