Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A71 is way older than Motorola Edge 50, it's design is a little thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and a bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy A71 counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A71 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy A71 has a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.