Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus, having a global score of 87.5 against 79.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 and the Moto G Stylus were released with only a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
Moto G Stylus has a screen that's just as good as the Galaxy A71 one, because although the Moto G Stylus has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2300px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel quantity per inch in the screen. The Moto G Stylus and Samsung Galaxy A71 feature extremely similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A71 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 features a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 costs more money than the Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.