Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 global score. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, we must tell that it's also a a little bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 has a more recent 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a display that is very similar to the display in Galaxy A71, because although the Motorola Moto Z4 has a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. Moto Z4 and Galaxy A71 have extremely similar memory for games and applications, both have equal internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A71 features a bit better processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photos and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.