Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy A71 is a incredibly newer and a little bit lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, but it is just a bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bit larger screen and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy A71 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy A71 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.