Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is a bit better than the Galaxy M30s, with a overall score of 87.5 against 83.3. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy A71 is a somewhat thinner and just a little lighter device than the Galaxy M30s, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a processing unit that is very similar to the Galaxy A71 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy M30s has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A71 has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A71 also has 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy M30s counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy A71, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 also has a back camera with a much better resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.