Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note9's 87.1 general score. Galaxy A71's body is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note9. Galaxy Note9 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy Note9 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960. Samsung Galaxy A71 and Galaxy Note9 both have incredibly similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A71 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and video in low light situations and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy Note9.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.