Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 87.5 against 77.8. Galaxy A71's design is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released 4 years before. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a larger display and a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy A71 counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A71, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and a much larger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has improved battery duration than Galaxy A71, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A71 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.