Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016)'s 72.8 general score. The iPhone XS Max construction is newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016). IPhone XS Max features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a bit more pixels per screen inch, a little bit bigger screen and a better 1242 x 2688 resolution.
IPhone XS Max counts with a greater performance than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A8 (2016) counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. The Apple iPhone XS Max captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.