Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 15 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 386 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than Galaxy A8 (2016), with a score of 79.2 against 72.8. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the previous 15 version and Galaxy A8 (2016) has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is incredibly newer and way thinner than Galaxy A8 (2016)'s, but it's just a little heavier.
The Galaxy A8 (2016) has a way better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display. The Galaxy A8 (2016) has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a much better video quality, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and a back camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a 42% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.