Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016)'s 72.8 general score. These phones work with Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016) has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), it's incredibly thinner and incredibly newer.
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016) has a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking display than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a bit higher pixels density, a really larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way better resolution camera and a larger aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery duration than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a 73 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.