Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, having an 87.6 score against 82.1. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bit larger display. LG V60 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG V60 ThinQ features longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, it also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels, a lot bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.