Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is much better than the Galaxy A8 Star's global score of 82.1. The LG Wing is a extremely newer phone than the Galaxy A8 Star, but it's extremely thicker and extremely heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG Wing counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a bit larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a bit higher display density. LG Wing counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG Wing has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. LG Wing shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG Wing has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.