Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is much better than the Galaxy A8 Star's 82.1 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an older 12 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Motorola Edge 20 Pro is just a bit thicker than Galaxy A8 Star, it's just a little lighter and notably newer.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bit greater screen pixel density, a quite bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.