Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having an 82.1 score against 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star body is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version, so it provides some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little greater pixels density, a little larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A8 Star has a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 400 GB.
The Galaxy A8 Star features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 200 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has superior battery duration than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.