Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A8 Star, getting a general score of 86.3 against 82.1. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's design is a lot newer and just a bit lighter than Galaxy A8 Star's, although it is just a little thicker. These phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version while Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite better pixel quantity in each display inch and a bit larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features improved battery performance than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3700mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos, a much more mega-pixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.