Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the Galaxy A8 Star, having an 87.1 score against 82.1. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version while Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer cellphone than the Galaxy A8 Star, but it's somewhat thicker and just a little heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little larger screen, a just a bit better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A8 Star has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back camera with much more megapixels and a larger camera aperture for better images in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.