Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy A8 Star, with a score of 86.2 against 82.1. Even though the Moto G200 5G is extremely newer than the Galaxy A8 Star, it's somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display, a little bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution. The Galaxy A8 Star counts with a bigger memory for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 400 GB.
Moto G200 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photos or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.