Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-27 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and Brown |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 Star is a bit better than the Motorola One Vision, having a global score of 82.1 against 80.7. Even though Galaxy A8 Star and Motorola One Vision were released only 9 months apart, the Galaxy A8 Star body is just a little bit heavier but also somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star features a little better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola One Vision also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a just a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. Motorola One Vision counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera and a lot larger sensor.
Motorola One Vision counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A8 Star features just a little better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.