Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-27 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 Star has a score of 82.1, which is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 global score. Despite of the fact the Galaxy A8 Star is older and just a bit heavier than the Motorola One Zoom, it's design is still thinner. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a screen that is very similar to the Galaxy A8 Star one, although the Motorola One Zoom also has a just a little higher pixel density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bigger display. Motorola One Zoom features a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola One Zoom has just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.