Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's 82.1 overall score. Motorola razr (2020) is a notably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, although it's just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. These devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy A8 Star has a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a little larger display. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A8 Star features improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.