Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-08-27 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Galaxy A8 Star, with a general score of 91.3 against 82.1. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy A52 5G is a incredibly newer and just a bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A8 Star, but it's also a bit thicker.
Galaxy A52 5G features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A8 Star and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G both count with extremely similar CPUs, they have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.